The 2022 Smith Shield Moot took place at the Weldon Law Building on October 5, 2022. With a tradition dating back to 1927, Smith Shield competitors are chosen from the top mooters in the compulsory second-year moot.
The mooters argued the appeal of the fictional caseĀ Studley v Cape Prudence Catholic Hospital, beforeĀ Justice Duncan R. Beveridge, Nova Scotia Court of Appeal; Justice D. Timothy Gabriel, Supreme CourtĀ of Nova Scotia; and Melanie Petrunia, President, Nova Scotia Barristers' Society.
According to the case, Ms. Studley lost an arm following a boating accident and having underwent an emergency procedure at Cape Prudence Catholic Hospital. She asked the hospital to bury the arm, temporarily, until she was ready to reābury it near Halifax. Some years later, following extensive therapy, Ms. Studley asked for the buried arm back. The hospital refused, arguing that the arm was buried in a consecrated churchyard, in a communal grave and that they were concerned with public health risks of disinterment.
During the moot,Ā Jack Bennet and Leandra BoumanĀ represented the appellant, andĀ Nicole Arski and Emma Vossen represented the respondent.
The 2022 Smith Shield Moot Competition explored who owns a personās severed limbs, whether fulfilling a request by the person who lost the limb for disinterment from a collective grave offends or reflects dignity, whether limbs should be compared to gametes or cremated remains in sorting out legal rights, and whether it is possible to calculate damages for interference with limbs.
āIt was meaningful to translate my research from my doctoral dissertation into the Studley case which was designed from interviews I did with individuals whose tissues were taken from them and disposed in ways contrary to their wishes,ā says Joshua Shaw, faculty supervisor for the Smith Shield Moot and Schulich Fellow. āOne interviewee, in particular, inspired the scenario. He expressed hope that his participation in my research might help others, similarly without limbs or tissues following an accident but who desired their return to help them feel whole, to restore a sense of autonomy, to maintain dignity.ā
Nicole Arski and Jack Bennet (Photo: Bruce Bottomley)
This yearās winners were Nicole Arski and Jack Bennet who received the A.S. Pattillo Prize in Advocacy. The runners-up were Leandra Bouman and Emma Vossen who were recognized with the Leonard A. Kitz Prize in Advocacy.
āI am thankful to Professor Shaw, whose unique moot problem allowed my fellow mooters and I to explore an unfamiliar and exciting legal issue,ā says Arski. āIt was truly an honour to participate in the 2022 Smith Shield Moot. Both the 1L and 2L moots were highlights of my law school experience, and I feel lucky to have been afforded another opportunity to grow as an advocate.ā
āIt has been a pleasure working with Professor Shaw, Leandra, Nicole, and Emma while preparing for the Smith Shield Moot,ā says Bennet. āIt was an honour to argue this important issue in front of the competitionās justices and the wider Weldon community. Having this opportunity and sharing it with my outstanding teammates will be a highlight of my time at law school.ā
Shaw says he felt privileged to be the faculty supervisor for the Smith Shield Moot and to work with the exceptional students involved.
āThe students worked tirelessly since late August when I first introduced them to the fictional case I authored as the moot problem,ā says Shaw. āTheir dedication resulted in the high quality of their written and oral submissions, which considered a challenging and rarely argued area of law.ā
Congratulations to the students who took part in this yearās Smith Shield Moot, and thank you to our judges and everyone behind the scenes who helped make this year's moot a pilipiliĀž». We look forward to continuing the tradition next year!
Recent News
- Assistant Professor Andrew Flavelle Martin cited in "Supreme Court of Canada Judgement re: Quebec (Attorney General) v. Pekuakamiulnuatsh Takuhikan"
- Inspiring Kids to Believe that Caring Can Be Cool
- Professor Camille Cameron ft in "Can Big Oil be made to pay like Big Tobacco?"
- DLAS Community Legal Worker Mark Culligan ft in "91 residents of N.S. mobile home park file for return of 'unlawful' water charges"
- Professor Emeritus Wayne MacKay ft in "'Dogāsitter films explicit OnlyFans content in client homes, raising privacy concerns"
- Professor Elaine Craig ft in "Sexual Integrity, Pornography and Law with Dr. Elaine Craig (part 2)"
- The Schulich School of Law Welcomes Lisson ExpertsāināResidence
- Professor Sara Seck ft in "More to business law than meets the eye"